Frankfurter Kommentar zum SGB VIII: Kinder- und Jugendhilfe. Front Cover. Johannes Münder. Juventa, – Child welfare – pages. Frankfurter Kommentar SGB VIII by Thomas Meysen, Thomas Trenczek Johannes Münder. our price 0, Save Rs. 0. Buy Frankfurter Kommentar SGB VIII online. : Frankfurter Kommentar SGB VIII () and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books available now at great.
|Published (Last):||10 February 2008|
|PDF File Size:||4.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.30 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Decision about the provisional taking care of an unaccompanied refugee minor and clarification of the steps to verify the age. The parties argue about the provisional caretaking of the claimant as an unaccompanied refugee minor by the regional youth welfare office in the district of the defendant in Dachau, Frankfhrter. He is an Afghan national whose request to be taken care of was denied first by the youth welfare office and later by the frankfyrter court in Munich because of doubts about his age, interpreted by means of his general outer appearance.
Frankfurter Kommentar SGB VIII Kinder- Und Jugendhilfe | Book | eBay
In later interviews which were conducted by the youth welfare office they came to the conclusion that he was 19 years old and therefore not eligible for their service. The result of the age assessment is not a pre-condition for a provisionally taking care of the child, but more it is the assignment of the caretaking itself, which means if the age fran,furter uncertain, the person has to be taken care of. Often in these countries the date of birth is not considered as that important, there lommentar no reliable registers of births.
At the end the general impression is the determined factor.
The inspection has to be carried out by at least two members of the staff of the youth welfare office. The court gives very little options of when the vrankfurter inspection is not doubtful.
The assessment of the existence of doubts lies within the control of the administrative courts. The court states that doubts in the process of the qualified inspection always exist when it cannot be denied with absolute certainty that a medical examination will not state that concerned person might frnkfurter underage.
If even medical reports suffer from uncertainties determining age, then an inspection carried out by workers of kom,entar youth welfare office has to be considered as even more uncertain. The only situation in which the inspection can be viewed as certain is when it approves the age of the child. Skip to main content.
Bavarian Administrative Court Bayrischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof.
Frankfurter Kommentar zum SGB VIII: Kinder- und Jugendhilfe – Johannes Münder – Google Books
Child Specific ConsiderationsUnaccompanied minorVulnerable person. First kommentsr age is to be determined by examining the documents of identification.
The court later clarifies how the different steps have to be interpreted and carried out. Germany – Bayrischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Germany – Administrative Court Bremen, decision from Germany – Oberverwaltungsgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany – Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin Brandenburg Germany – Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg Report an issue with this case summary.